"Fire in the little animals."
At the end of this letter, Leeuwenhoek wrote about another common idea that his observations had disproved:
As a result of the observations related above I have no doubt but yourself and the learned Philosophers will agree with me in stating that the testicles have been made for no other purpose than to furnish the little animals in them, and to keep them till they are ejected.
But if this is the case, what about all the particles, called vessels by me and fibres by you, found in the male human semen besides the little animals? At one time I thought that the fibres or vessels came from the testicles, and that the little animals were produced in the virile member, but here the contrary proves.
Also, those who have always tried to maintain that the little animals were the product of putrefaction and did not serve for procreation, will be defeated. Some also imagine that these little animals do not live, but that it is only the fire that is present in the little animals. But I take it that these little animals are composed of such a multitude of parts as, such people believe, compose our bodies.
Not everyone was as resistant. Robert Hooke had written to Leeuwenhoek about what happened when King Charles II became curious (portrait at about age 50 on right by John Riley c. 1680; click to enlarge).
But when I communicated my calculation and something about my method, your colleague, Mr. Robert Hooke, increased the number and wrote to tell me that His Royal Majesty, having heard about it, was anxious to see it, and that Mr. Hooke complied with his request, and that His Majesty seeing the little animals, contemplated them in astonishment and mentioned my name with great respect.
Leeuwenhoek understood how incredible his observations seemed, the impossibility of the quantities.
And although I am convinced that these observations, imparted by me, will be accepted by few people because it is impossible for so small a quantity of matter to contain so many living creatures, I will bear those who reject it no grudge, the less so because, when I wrote about the great number of living creatures in water, even the Royal Society would not accept it.