Specimens: Sperm
Leeuwenhoek observed sperm in various animals for forty years in about thirty letters, around a fifth of the 165 letters that he published himself. The two letters in 1711 and 1712 that were not published by him were excerpted in Philosophical Transactions.
Leeuwenhoek was among the leading spermists (also called animalculists), who theorized that reproduction occurred through the sperm. Other prominent spermists included Nicolaas Hartsoeker and Gottfried Leibniz. The role of the ovaries and eggs was not clear to them. The ovists, who theorized that reproduction occurred through the female egg, far out-numbered the spermists.
Links to letters below under Learn more.
- 1677 November (Letter 35 [22]) to William Brouckner: human sperm
- 1678 March 18 (Letter 38 [24]) to Nehemiah Grew: dog, rabbit, stallion and bull, theory of impregnation
- 1678 May 31 (Letter 39 [25]) to Nehemiah Grew: rabbit, dog
- 1679 February 21 (Letter 42 [27]) to Nehemiah Grew: cod
- 1679 April 25 (Letter 43 [28]) to Nehemiah Grew: cod, pike, more than 10,000 little animals in every small sand-grain of matter, hare, cock, estimated 50,000 sperm in a sand grain of matter, calculated 13,385,000,000 human beings on earth and 150,000,000,000 sperm in cod milt
- 1680 January 12 (Letter 54 [29]) to Robert Hooke: perch, bream, roach and tench
- 1680 April 5 (Letter 57 [30]) to Robert Hooke: rat, origin of sperm
- 1680 November 12 (Letter 65 [33]) to Robert Hooke: horse, may-bug, dragon-fly, grasshopper, fly, flea and gnat
- 1683 January 22 (Letter 70 [37]) to Christopher Wren: number of sperm repeated from Letter 43 [28]
- 1683 July 16 (Letter 72 [38]) to Christopher Wren: frog, rabbit and dog
- 1685 March 30 (Letter 84 [45]) to Members of the Royal Society: most detailed theory of impregnation
- 1685 July 13 (Letter 85 [46]) to Members of the Royal Society: similarities of plant and animal generation
- 1686 May 14 (Letter 92 [50]) to Antonio Magliabechi: included a passage from Letter 85 [46] about the germination of plants
- 1687 August 6 (Letter 102 [57]) to Members of the Royal Society: calandar
- 1688 August 24 (Letter 109 [64]) to Members of the Royal Society: calculated number of sperm in cod roe
- 1694 March 2 (Letter 134 [80] to to Members of the Royal Society: no sperm found in any eggs
- 1695 September 18 (Letter 157 [95]) to Johann Wilhelm von Pfalz-Neuburg: mussels
- 1696 July 6 (Letter 170 [103]) to Nicolaas Witsen: oysters
- 1700 July 9 (Letter 214 [128]) to Hans Sloane: cock
- 1700 October 26 (Letter 219 [134]) to Hans Sloane: aphids
- 1700 December 25 (Letter 220 [135] to Hans Sloane: ram, man, cock, objections to Hartsoeker
- 1701 April 15 (Letter 224 [137]) to Members of the Royal Society: cod, pike, ram
- 1701 December 6 (Letter 231 [142] to Hans Sloane: cock
- 1701 December 20 (Letter 232 [143]) to Members of the Royal Society: spiders
- 1702 April 20 (Letter 236 [146]) Karl von Hessen-Kassel: silk moth
- 1711 August 18 (Letter 287) to James Petiver: ram
- 1712 March 1 (Letter 292) of to Members of the Royal Society: whale
- 1715 September 28 (Letter 317 [XVIII]) to Gottfried Leibniz: public acceptance of his theory of procreation, perch, cod
- 1716 May 19 (Letter 326 [XXIII]) to Gottfried Leibniz: impregnation
In three letters, Leeuwenhoek defended his ideas.
- 1698 December 17 (Letter 196 [113]) to Harmen van Zoelen
He defended the priority of his ideas about reproduction against Hartsoeker, quoting extensively from Letter 35 [22] of November 1677 and Letter 38 [24] of 18 March 1678 (see above)
- 1699 June 9 (Letter 200 [116]) to Members of the Royal Society
He defended his idea of sperm against Dalenpatius.
- 1699 June 23 (Letter 201 [117]) to Members of the Royal Society
He defended his idea of generation and reproduction of sperm against Lister.